|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who is more dangerous?
February 10, 2008 on 8:58 amThis Radley Balko post compares British pandering to Nazis during a 1938 sporting event and a similar surrender during the upcoming Beijing Olympics.
When I clicked through an excellent Daily Mail piece on the subject, I saw an astonishing poll up on the site. It asks: “Which of these men poses the bigger threat to Britain’s way of life?” The choices? Abu Hamza or the Archbishop of Canterbury.
At first I was a little surprised at the question. But then I remembered the context.
Radical Muslim cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri is serving a seven-year prison sentence for “soliciting murder and inciting racial hatred.”
The Archbishop of Canterbury is the senior leader of the Church of England and the man who this week stated that he believed it was “unavoidable” that Islamic sharia laws would coexist alongside British law.
So, tough call.
Online polls mean little, but, still, guess who’s winning big as of Sunday morning?
No Comments yet
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
